Friday, March 4, 2011

Dear Governor...

The following is a copy of the letter sent by MG School Board President Susan Fox. I agree wholeheartedly.

Governor Walker,

Speaking as a local school board president, I appreciate some of the required contributions to health care benefits and even the retirement system, although I would not have enacted the level you chose all at once. That level of salary cut is very difficult for teachers and other public employees and it will have a significant negative impact on the local economy in the form of reduced discretionary spending. I do not support some other provisions of your "repair bill."


With regard to your budget proposal, the only interpretation possible is that this is an all-out attack on public education. The so-called "tools" you give us, in the form of employee contributions to benefits (salary cuts), will not come close to filling this hole. Additionally, if you really believe that we can lay off our most senior (expensive) teachers and replace them with people right out of college, or even those with a master's degree, you need to collect information from people working with schools. The negative impact on schools caused by the loss of this knowledge/experience base (these are the people who mentor our beginning teachers) is huge, to say nothing of age discrimination lawsuits. Schools improve in a collaborative culture with accountability built in.

We have worked hard at Monona Grove to build a collaborative process of using student performance data to inform teaching, and to build a process by which teachers share best practices. We are seeing positive effects, in early reading, for example, as well as in other skills. Your funding reductions threaten the gains we are making. When we increase class sizes to more than 30 (our current middle and high school max), we reduce the time teachers have to grade papers and provide meaningful feedback and re-teaching experiences for students. When we increase the number of classes teachers have to teach, we increase the exhaustion level, in addition to the number of students with whom to form relationships. Studies show that relationships between staff and students have a significant impact on student achievement. I seriously would like to see the critics of teachers spend just one day teaching a full class load, and of course a week would be even better.

I recognize that we need to make changes. We need to come up with a more equitable funding plan and re-invest in public schools. This is crucial to the economic success of our state as well as our country. How many businesses will want to locate in Wisconsin when the public school system has declined? Schools are a part of the high quality of life here. Private charter schools do not have any better track record over all than public schools. The method of school governance is not what determines school effectiveness; rather, the crucial elements are the teaching and the learning. At Monona Grove, we have worked with other districts on a curriculum model that uses data heavily and which works to improve student performance. We use the research-based benchmarks set by the ACT, and are incorporating these with the national core standards. With the loss of the public school system comes a situation of increasingly random acts of improvement.

Please invite us to the table to talk about these issues. These sweeping changes will be devastating and cause damage that will be hard to fix when the pendulum swings the other way in a few years. When making significant changes, thought must be given to all the ramifications. Compromise is usually the best course.

Respecftully,
Susan Fox

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Three cheers.

Anonymous said...

If anything will bring our communties together, it is the bone-headed governor!

Anonymous said...

Thanks for writing this Susan,and thanks to Peter for posting and commenting. I would like to hear what the other 5 board members think about life in Walker World.

Anonymous said...

So 25 teachers may need to be cut if the budget passes. Only sounds like 2 per grade, plus one more someplace, which only results in about 8 more kids in each classroom. It will be the new norm statewide as everyone will be doing it and it will be accepted.

Another concept may be to eliminate nearly all of the specials or related arts, or just eliminat eall of them. This could shorten the school day and have the kids home early. Parents can make the best choices and have their child become well rounded through their choices of activities with their kids.

I think the new bill does allow MG to raise enough revenue to offset the cuts by charging the District employees to park on campus?

Eliminate all funding for extra curriulars and have the athletes really pay to play. Pay for the field maintanance, the pool maintainance, the workers at the scorers table, the officials, the busses and the whole shabang!
Other great ideas?

The letter from Sue is outstanding, and it needs to be shared in public places other than here.

Anonymous said...

If you eliminate all extra-curriculars, and maintain them only for those who can afford to pay for them, you eliminate that opportunity for many, many kids whose families won't be able to pick up the tab.

We either have public schools for all, or we don't.

If you're looking for ideas, here's one totally unrelated to educating kids (which music and art, actually do) --eliminate bussing. Get rid of the requirement that forces schools to pick up the tab for getting kids to school. Make that the parent's responsibility. Bussing costs the district hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and has nothing to do with educating children.

Same with school lunch programs -- let's get rid of those before we cut music and art.

Anonymous said...

If the Bill and Budget go through, it seems keeping things that start with "Extra" will unfortunately have to go before things like "Education" are eliminated.

Those who can't afford to go eat at a steak house usually eat dinner at home and make do. Those who can't afford to pay for school sports may play in the public park with their friends and make do.

Peter Sobol said...

I believe we are required to bus all students outside of 2 miles from the school, and the school lunch program isn't currently subsidized by general funds.

Anonymous said...

If Walker's really interested in providing "tools" to school districts for balancing their budgets, he might as well end the requirement of bussing. It has no direct educational impact, and if want he wants to is essentially balance school budgets on the backs of teachers and other staff (through increased benefit/health care contributions), he might as well ask sacrifice of parents, as well. Neighborhood van pools, share car rides -- there is really no justifiable educational reason for bussing. Shared sacrifice, anyone?

Anonymous said...

"Shared sacrifice" my butt. The only people who are being ask to sacrifice are the middle class and the poor. Rich people never get asked to sacrifice and they can afford a private school so they are stakeholders in none of this.

And the only "tool" in this equation is Walker himself.

Anonymous said...

What about selling district property that is underutilized, e.g. Maywood once this school year is up and what was formerly Nichols?

Anonymous said...

If you look at the board agenda via the MG site, the District is getting ready to sell something for over 3 million.

Anonymous said...

Selling property to balance the budget (or bail it out) is a one-time fix -- and an awful way to budget. Money used by selling property should only be re-invested in property improvements -- whether it's to fix leaky roofs, upgrade bathrooms or maybe even increase energy efficiency of buildings. Those are one-time costs that have a long shelf-life. Walker's budget cuts directly impact the year-to-year expenses of the district, which are mostly personnel, and that's where nearly all of the cuts will be made.

Anonymous said...

Peter-
Could you recap what has been done or what the plans are with the $800,000 dollars the district was awarded and needed to do something with in what I thought was 2 years?

Peter Sobol said...

Yes, we do have $800K to use over the next to years. Our original plan was to use 1/2 of it each year to offset operating expenses for the next 2 years. My ~1.5M deficit estimate includes using half the money as planned.

Anonymous said...

"Rich people never get asked to sacrifice ..."

I guess that's, kind of, the definition and benefit of being "rich" (whatever "rich" means).