Showing posts with label achievement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label achievement. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2009

More ACT

Mary Possin forwarded a 2007 report from the state comparing ACT scores and college freshman GPA's both statewide and for MG graduates. The data includes MG students who graduated between 2003 and 2005 and attended the state university system. One chart: http://i653.photobucket.com/albums/uu251/petersobol/MGHSACTReadinessPG5.jpg

The data shows the correlation in aggregate between the ACT scores and college success, at least in the first semester. Unfortunately I don't have access to the raw data for a real statistical analysis, because I would like to see how this works on an individual basis, but the data does strongly reinforce the idea that the ACT college readiness standards are a good way to go.
Interestingly the data shows MG students outperform the statewide average for a given ACT score, something we need to consider as we move ahead with curriculum alignment.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Some business...

The board had an important meeting Wednesday, although the meeting went past eleven we heard detailed reviews of the district's RtI (Response to Intervention) program, our disproportionally data, and a review of our standardized test results (A district "report card" if you will). The data was put together and presented by John Faust, Ed O'Connor, Bill Breisch and Charlie Ellis. These gentlemen did an excellent job putting together thorough and clear presentations for the board.

RTI is a system to service students with special needs, it relies on assessment of the effectiveness (the response) to enhanced instruction provided (the intervention) to these students. The emphasis is on results, not identification. RTI is a response to the problem that student achievement tends to stagnate once students are identified as having special needs in traditional special ed systems. Our district is still in the process of implementing this system, but we do have a leadership role in Wisconsin. Some of our data already shows apparent success of this approach in MG schools at the elementary level.

“Disproportionally” refers is the difference in achievement between our minority and white students, it is manifest in academic achievement data as well is the ratio of students identified with special needs or challenges, these ratios are often 3 times greater for minority students. This is a significant problem state wide, and our district is no different.

Overall our district's academic data is not as encouraging. While both growth and achievement are well above average, results are stagnant and not improving as much as I would like to see. It’s the reason the board needs to focus on achievement and not the issues of buildings, buses and fields that have been such a distraction over these last several years.

On the subject of the budget, a succession of little things over the summer has added up to increase our projected budget deficit for the current year. From an estimated $250,000 it is up to about $600,000- but we won't know precisely until the 3rd Friday count is in next week. This will take our fund balance down to the minimum acceptable or below. Bad news, and unfortunately the state budget means that next year will be significantly worse - we will probably be needing to find $1M in the next budget.

One more thing: This year we moved the annual meeting a few weeks earlier to make it easier to meet the state deadlines at the end of October. We didn't know at the time that the date we picked, Monday October 5th, was going to conflict with the Packers vs. Vikings game. Sorry 'bout that!